The Northern Express Herald
Listener
Opinion

Luxon’s bold defence claims contradicted by NZ’s outdated aircraft and low budget

Opinion by
New Zealander Bernard Lagan is the Australian correspondent for the Times, London

Big talk: PM Christopher Luxon is set on military “interoperability” with Australia. Photo / Getty Images

Opinion: Christopher Luxon’s airy declaration that New Zealand can be a force multiplier for Australia’s military are valiant words from a leader whose air force cannot reliably fly him to Sydney.

Luxon and his predecessors Jacinda Ardern and John Key have all suffered the ignominy of the RNZAF’s fickle, 30-year-old Boeing 757 aircraft failing on official overseas visits – in March, the PM’s plane broke down even before it could leave Wellington for Australia.

This is not intended to slur the highly regarded RNZAF, which has flown your correspondent around the world; rather, to jab successive timorous defence ministers – with the notable exception of New Zealand First’s Ron Mark – who failed to deliver much in the way of funds and new equipment for defence.

It makes even more incredible Luxon’s boast in Canberra that he wants New Zealand’s military to be “fully interoperable with” Australia’s far larger, far better-equipped and much better-funded armed forces.

Hairy-chested stuff.

Australia might ask: what more can NZ bring to the table when Wellington’s defence spending remains so low?

Australia expects to spend $55.7 billion (NZ$61.4b) on defence this financial year, up 6%, while New Zealand’s $4.95 billion is a reduction of 6.6%, according to a Reuters analysis.

Both countries claim to share peace and security aims – we steer by the same stars, as Anthony Albanese fondly told his Kiwi mate in their ritual show of bonhomie last month. But they don’t put the same effort in.

Australians have long accepted higher defence costs and risks than New Zealanders have; Australia’s proportion of defence spending to GDP exceeds 2% while New Zealand’s is barely 1%. An analysis published by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute found New Zealanders each contribute $426 to their defence; Australians spend A$1438.

Could it be that too many New Zealand politicians care less about the state of their defence forces because they assume their mates across the Tasman will meet any threat?